| VEDECKÝ ČASOPIS O DEJINÁCH SLOVENSKA A
STREDNEJ EURÓPY
VYDÁVA HISTORICKÝ ÚSTAV SLOVENSKEJ AKADÉMIE VIED, V. V. I.
ISSN 0018-2575 (print)
ISSN 2585-9099 (online)
EV 3084/09
 Všetky obsahy sú čitateľom voľne dostupné podľa licencie Creative Commons CC BY 4.0.
Indexovanie a abstraktovanie:
Web of Science Core Collection: Arts & Humanities Citation Index
Additional Web of Science Indexes: Current Contents Arts & Humanities
Scopus
CEEOL
CEJSH
EBSCO Historical Abstracts
ESF (HUM)
ERIH plus
|
AKTUÁLNE ČÍSLO | REDAKCIA | POKYNY PRE AUTOROV | ARCHÍV | PREDPLATNÉ | O ČASOPISE | PUBLIKAČNÁ ETIKA |
VÝZVY
CSIBA, Balázs
Kráľovský personál v Šamoríne 1525 – 1526
The Chief Justice in Šamorín 1525‒1526
Historický časopis, 2025, 73, 4, pp. 697-718, Bratislava.
Abstract: At the end of 1525, King Louis II, at the request of the nobles
of the Bratislava County, sent the chief justice Nicholas of Turiec (Turóci) to
the royal town of Šamorín, where, together with the vicecomes, iudices nobilium
and for this purpose elected jurors, he created a judicial tribunal, where he
primarily dealt with criminal acts and property law matters. In accordance with
court practice, the documents were issued in the name of the king and confirmed
with his judicial seal, however, some customs of the county were respected,
especially regarding summons to court. The trial was divided into two phases,
with the judicial council meeting at least between 11 and 22 December 1525 and
between 29 December and 12 January. In the earlier stages of the sessions mainly
summons were issued, court orders even after the dissolution of the tribunal.
Between the two phases during the Christmas break, Turóci visited the city of
Bratislava. Unlike the courts at the royal court, the Šamorín tribunal had a
regional character, meaning that the sources are limited to only a few archive
collections, and because of this, reconstructing its course and court
proceedings in their entirety was not possible. Not only nobles appeared in
court, but also representatives of church institutions and individuals, even
Bratislava burghers and, in two cases, members of the tribunal. The majority of
disputes had already been tried at the royal court and even in Šamorín did not
reach a permanent resolution. Out-of-court settlements, usually mediated by the
court, were not very successful either. This fact does not indicate the
inefficiency or low prestige of the Šamorín court, but rather the clumsiness of
the Hungarian judiciary in the years before the Mohács disaster.
Keywords: Chief justice. County of Bratislava. Šamorín. Administration of
justice.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31577/histcaso.2025.73.4.3
Do Vašej pozornosti ďalej
odporúčame:
Historický ústav SAV |
História
Revue | Forum
Historiae |
Historické štúdie |
Slovanské štúdie |
SNKH |
Slovenská historická spoločnosť
pri SAV | SDKSVE pri
SAV | Dejiny.sk
| 